Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife FISH AND SHELLFISH SCIENCE

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE REPORT Download Report in PDF Format
Annual Postseason Report 2004-05 Fishing Season:
Comprehensive Management Plan for Puget Sound Chinook: Harvest Management Component

PDF Format - [2.73MB]

Get ADOBE Acrobat Reader

See Also:
Comprehensive Management Plan for Puget Sound Chinook: Harvest Management Component

Annual Postseason Reports:

NEW! Annual Postseason Report 2005-06 Fishing Season - Comprehensive Management Plan for
Puget Sound Chinook: Harvest Management Component

Annual Postseason Report 2004-05 Fishing Season - Comprehensive Management Plan for
Puget Sound Chinook: Harvest Management Component

Annual Postseason Report 2003-04 Fishing Season - Comprehensive Management Plan for
Puget Sound Chinook: Harvest Management Component

Annual Postseason Report 2004-05 Fishing Season
Comprehensive Management Plan for Puget Sound Chinook: Harvest Management Component
:
By Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Puget Sound Treaty Indian Tribes*
June 28, 2005

*Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, Lower Elwha S'Klallam Tribe, Lummi Nation, Makah Tribe, Muckleshoot Tribe, Nisqually Tribe, Nooksack Tribe, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, PuyallupTribe, Sauk-Suiattle Tribe, Skokomish Tribe, Squaxin Island Tribe, Stillaguamish Tribe, Suquamish Tribe, Swinomish Tribal Community, Tulalip Tribes, and Upper Skagit Tribe; Point No Point Treaty Council, Skagit River System Cooperative, and Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission.

Executive Summary

Management Year 2004 (May 2004 through April 2005) presented inconsistent fishery and population outcomes. Actual escapement was lower than projected for the Nooksack, Stillaguamish, Puyallup fall, White River spring, Mid-Hood Canal and Elwha management units. Nooksack, mid-Hood Canal, and Dungeness management units each returned at levels below the HMP Low Abundance Threshold (Figure 0 A), as was predicted preseason. Nooksack, Snohomish, mid-Hood Canal, and Dungeness units were managed for Critical Exploitation Rate Ceilings in the 2004-05 season.

Figure 0 A 2004 Escapement in Relation to CCHMP Low Abundance Threshold (LAT)


Fisheries were conducted as anticipated preseason, but catches in some of those fisheries exceeded preseason predictions. Overall, catches in major fisheries impacting Puget Sound Chinook were higher than expected preseason. Canadian impacts exceeded preseason projections by 30%. Puget Sound fisheries posted mixed results, but in the aggregate exceeded expectations by 9%. Pre-terminal net and troll fishery catch exceeded preseason predictions due to higher-than-anticipated treaty troll effort and success, and greater impacts during U.S. preterminal sockeye fisheries (Figure 0 B). Catches in the individual terminal areas of Skagit, Stillaguamish-Snohomish, South Puget Sound and Hood Canal terminal areas were higher than preseason projections, commensurate with higher-than-forecast run sizes of hatchery and/or natural Chinook there. Chinook harvests in the Nooksack-Samish terminal area were far below preseason expectations, matching the low returns of hatchery fall Chinook in that area.

Figure 0 B Comparison of Preseason Predicted Catches with Preliminary Postseason Catch

In terms of fishery monitoring, most, if not all, sampling goals were met throughout Puget Sound, and the numbers of enforcement hours in the 2004 management year were up dramatically from previous years.

Overall, implementation of 2004 fisheries resulted in escapement higher or equal to projections for most stocks, with few exceptions. It is too soon to determine whether deviations in catch made a difference in total exploitation for the affected populations. This evaluation will be the subject of focused analysis, methods for which will be determined in the coming year.


Find a bug or error in the system? Let us know about it!
© 2005 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
E-mail <webmaster@dfw.wa.gov>