![]() |
![]() |
|
Acknowledgments
Measuring juvenile salmon production from large river systems like the Green River involves a tremendous amount of work. Key to developing these estimates are the long hours of trap operation provided by our dedicated scientific technicians: Brett Brown, Bill Cooke, Matt Kinne, Ethan Kruse, and Scott Schueltzer. Logistical support and map development was provided by Wild Salmon Production Evaluation Unit biologists, Mike Ackley and Laurie Peterson, respectively. A number of other individuals and agencies contributed to this project. For providing access to the trap site, we thank the adjacent landowner, Bill Mosby. We also thank Mike Wilson, Manager of the Soos Creek Hatchery, for providing logistical support, office space, and a secure staging site near the trap. And finally, we thank Fred Goetz of the United States Army Corps of Engineers for providing funding and coordination for this project. |
Executive Summary
The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listed Puget Sound chinook as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) in March 1999. This listing triggered action on the part of state and
local governments to develop plans and implement actions designed to restore Puget Sound chinook
runs to healthy levels. An important, but often missing, component of the plans is accurate
information on wild chinook abundances and the factors that limit or impact production and
productivity in key wild chinook stocks. One such key stock, Green River chinook, represents one of
the largest populations of chinook within the Puget Sound Evolutionary Significant Unit (ESU).
Since quantifying juvenile anadromous salmonid populations as they migrate seaward is the most
direct assessment of stock performance in freshwater, a long-term wild juvenile salmon production
study was initiated in the Green River to estimate and monitor the production of chinook and coho
salmon, and steelhead trout.
Beyond monitoring for ESA considerations, this study provides important information for run-size
forecasting and enables assessment of recovery actions in terms of change in wild salmon production.
The study will also be used to evaluate a large water storage and diversion project on the Green River
(Howard Hansen Dam [HHD] Additional Water Storage [AWS] Project). This report documents our
investigations during 2001, the second year of this project and the second and final year of preconstruction
baseline monitoring for the AWS project. Study objectives in 2001 include estimating
Green River wild chinook freshwater production, migrant size, and migration timing to evaluate the
condition of the stock and to help develop a better understanding of factors influencing their
production and life history.
To accomplish these objectives, we operated a floating screw trap on the mainstem Green River
(river mile 34.5). A portion of all downstream migrating juvenile salmonids were captured in this
trap. To estimate the capture efficiency, over the season groups of dye- marked or fin- marked fish
were released upstream of the trap. Nightly migration was estimated by dividing the nightly catch by
the estimate of trap efficiency.
Over the 182-day January 31 to August 1 trapping period, over 56,000 juvenile chinook were
captured. From this catch and our estimates of trap efficiency, we estimated a total of 728,000 age
0+ wild chinook migrated past our trap in 2001.
During both years of operation (2000 and 2001), the chinook migration followed a bi-modal timing
distribution. An earlier-timed “fry” component, comprised of newly emerged fry that migrated
between January and early April, was followed by a later-timed “smolt” component comprised of
larger chinook smolts that migrated from May through June. We have observed this timing
distribution in other rivers monitored in western Washington.
Relating our estimate of age 0+ chinook production to the number of eggs estimated
to have been deposited above the trap results in an egg-to-migrant survival
estimate of 5.3%.
We estimated 497,000 age 0+ chinook were produced below the trap for a total 2001 Green River age
0+ chinook natural production of 1.23- million. This estimate of lower river production was made by
assuming the egg-to- migrant survival of chinook eggs deposited below the trap was equal to that
measured above the trap and that the natural production from Big Soos Creek was the same as was
estimated in 2000.
In addition to age 0+ chinook, we also estimated 55,000 wild and 132,000 hatchery coho smolts, and
15,000 wild and 45,000 hatchery steelhead smo lts migrated past the trap. No cutthroat smolts were
captured in the trap in 2001.
Since most hatchery fish released upstream of the trap were adipose- marked, we were able to
estimate survival to the trap of marked chinook, coho, and steelhead. Assuming that hatchery fish are
trapped at the same rate as wild fish, we estimated a 67% survival of Keta Creek coho, 15% survival
of Keta Creek and Palmer Ponds steelhead, combined, and 0.22% survival of age 0+ Keta Creek
chinook released upstream of Howard Hansen Dam.
Over the two years of baseline monitoring related to the AWS project, age 0+ wild chinook
production upstream of the trap ranged from 535,000 in 2000 to 728,000 in 2001. Variation in the
proportion of chinook migrating as fry and smolts occurred over the two years with 53% of the
production migrating as fry in 2001 compared to 68% in 2000. Since more of the production
migrated as fry in 2000, seasonal chinook migration timing was earlier that year. The median
migration point occurred nearly a month later in 2001 compared to 2000. Results from monitoring
production in other rivers suggests that production levels and migration timing measured from just
two years of baseline monitoring in the Green River likely underestimates the true variability in these
components of chinook life history.
|