WDFW LogoWashington Department of Fish & Wildlife
  HELP | EMPLOYMENT | NEWS | CONTACT  
WDFW LogoFishing & Shellfishing
Report a Poacher or Other Violation

Fishing Hotline
360-902-2500

Shellfish Rule
Change Hotline

1-866-880-5431

More Hotline Information...

For more information on
fishing, please contact the
WDFW Fish Program.
360-902-2700
Fish Program District Biologists

For fishing regulation
questions, e-mail us at:
fishregs@dfw.wa.gov

For all other questions and comments, e-mail us at:
fishpgm@dfw.wa.gov

 

 
See proposed rule
language (CR-103)
2013 Recreational Fishing Rules Concise Explanatory Statement
Fish & Wildlife Commission
Meeting Feb. 8-9, 2013

2013 – 2014 Sportfishing Rule Proposals – Briefing and Public Hearing. Audio available.

Sportfishing Rule Changes for 2013-2014

Sportfishing Rule Proposals & Comments

View proposals and comments on proposals that were submitted by the public and WDFW staff.
There are two types of rules available for viewing.


Recommended
for Public Comment
Not Recommended
for further consideration
View by Category
Statewide Coastal Region
Freshwater
Statewide
Shellfish/Seaweed
Puget Sound
Region Freshwater
Coastal Region
Marine
Puget Sound
Region Marine
Eastern Washington and
Columbia Region Freshwater

Reference ID: DFW651729

Original Rule Proposal     See comments

Reference ID: DFW651729
Recreational Opportunities      Submission Type: Public
Rules Category:
Coastal Region Freshwater
Species covered in proposed rule
 • Marine Bottomfish
Rule to Change:
Marine Area 12 (Hood Canal) bottomfish closed
New Rule Proposal:
Separate Marine Area 12 into two subareas (like Marine Areas 8-1 and 8-2) and allow fishing for bottomfish in the northern area (say north of Stavis Bay) that is not affected by oxygen depletion issues
Why the change is needed:
Fishers in Hood Canal have very limited opportunities generally, and are currently limited to fishing for only salmon. All of Area 12 does not need to remain closed to bottom fishing in order to deal with the oxygen-depletion issue in the southern portion of the Canal; the portion of Hood Canal north of the floating bridge is already open for bottomfish, and prohibiting fishing for bottomfish everywhere south of the bridge is arbitrary and unnecessary. There is an abundance of flatfish in the northern part of Hood Canal that would provide opportunities for the casual fisherman and children to keep an occasional fish or just to go out and practice catch-and-release, which is currently prohibited except for searun cutthroat trout, steelhead and salmon when in season. Promoting this recreational opportunity can be done easily and with no harm to bottomfish in the southern part of the Canal with an appropriate buffer to protect the area subject to oxygen depletion.
Names of individuals or groups with whom you have discussed this change:
None
Describe their support and/or concerns:
No input given
Submitted by: KRIEBEL, KEITH W — POULSBO, WA

Date submitted: 04/26/2012

WDFW Rule Proposal Recommendation

Not Recommended for further consideration     Reference ID: DFW651729

Hood Canal is closed to fishing for bottomfish due to concerns for bottomfish impacted by low dissolved oxygen primarily in the south Hood Canal. North Hood Canal is closed to provide a refuge for bottomfish that may move to the north as a temporary response to an acute stressor and to provide a source of bottomfish to repopulate south Hood Canal after low dissolved oxygen events.


Online Public Comments    (1 comments)

KRIEBEL, KEITH   September 20, 2012
POULSBO, WA  
Comments:
The DFW response is not responsive. The suggestion was that there be a reasonable buffer area included in the "south" Hood Canal area that would remain closed (to allow for the sanctuary referenced in the response), but to recognize that bottom fish from the stressed area will not move to areas north of Seabeck and therefore that fishing opportunities be created in the northern areas. As noted in the proposal, there is already an arbitrary cut-off (the Hood Canal Bridge) on bottom fishing in the Hood Canal, and I would like to see the science as to why that cut-off should remain where it is rather than be moved closer to where the low-oxygen problem actually exists.