| ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|---|
Management Recommendations
for
Washington's Priority Species, Volume IV: Birds
![]() |
Dendragapus obscurus |
GENERAL RANGE AND WASHINGTON DISTRIBUTION
Blue grouse are found throughout western North America, including the offshore islands of British Columbia, Canada. Their range extends from the southern portions of Alaska and the Yukon, south along the Pacific Coast to northern California. The range continues east, encompassing the Cascade and Sierra Nevada mountains of the Pacific Northwest and California, and the northern and central Rocky Mountains from Canada to Arizona (Aldrich 1963, Johnsgard 1973).
In Washington, blue grouse are found in
mountainous areas wherever open coniferous
forests are present (Soil Conservation
Service 1969). They are closely associated
with true fir (Abies spp.) and Douglas fir
(Pseudotsuga menziesii) forests (Johnsgard
1973). Hunter survey results from the 1995 season indicated that blue grouse were harvested
from all counties except Adams, Benton, Franklin, Grant, Island, San Juan, and Whitman
(Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 1996).
RATIONALE
The blue grouse is a recreationally important species that is vulnerable to habitat loss or
degradation.
HABITAT REQUIREMENTS
Blue grouse breed in open foothills and are closely associated with streams, springs, and
meadows. Much of the food they require comes from the succulent vegetation that grows in
these areas. During spring and summer blue grouse use stream bottoms and areas with gentle
slopes (Washington Department of Game 1961). In the fall they migrate to higher elevations
where they spend the winter feeding on fir needles (Soil Conservation Service 1969). Large fir
trees are a food source for wintering blue grouse and are required for roost sites. Blue grouse
exhibit strong site fidelity to their wintering areas (Cade 1984).
Diet
True fir and Douglas fir needles constitute 60% of blue grouse diet west of the Cascade
Mountains (Beer 1943). In other areas they are often supplemented with larch (Larix spp.) and
pine (Pinus spp.) needles (Boag 1963). Important forbs and grasses in drier climates include
balsamroot (Balsamorhiza spp.), buckwheat (Eriogonum spp.), dwarf mistletoe (Phoradendron
spp.), dandelion (Taraxacum spp.), false dandelion (Agoseris spp.), strawberry (Fragaria spp.),
clover (Trifolium spp.), sedge (Carex spp.), daisy or fleabane (Erigeron spp.), knotweed
(Polygonum spp.), manzanita or bearberry (Arctostaphylos spp.), huckleberry (Vaccinium spp.),
pussy toes (Antennaria spp.), elderberry fruit (Sambucus spp.), hawksbeard (Crepis spp.), dock
(Rumex spp.), starwort (Stellaria spp.), and lupine (Lupinus spp.) (Beer 1943, Boag 1963). A
study on Vancouver Island indicated that 90% of adult blue grouse diets consisted of bracken
fern (Pteridium aquilinum), willow (Salix spp.), Oregon grape (Berberis spp.), blackberry (Rubus
spp.), huckleberry, salal (Gaultheria spp.), and cat's ear (Hypochaeris spp.) (Johnsgard 1973).
Insects are also an important food source, especially for young chicks during their first 10 days of
life (Beer 1943).
Breeding Areas
Conifer thickets, their edges, and adjacent clearings are characteristic of high quality breeding habitat for blue grouse. Selective logging and small clearcuts have the potential to produce good blue grouse habitat by creating uneven aged timber stands with numerous 20-60 year-old thickets (Martinka 1972). Nests are usually located near logs or under low tree branches in open timber (Johnsgard 1973). Smith (1990) found that in Idaho, nesting occurs in brushy areas and that sites with tall sagebrush were preferred.
Mussehl (1962) stated that broods use areas with high plant density and diversity and high
canopy coverage. Bare ground should be less than 11%, and the average effective height of grass
and forbs should be 20 cm (8 in). Grass and forb cover in areas of highest use range from 53-85%. The forb component of high use areas is 11-41%. Typically, broods feed within 90 m (295
ft) of brush/tree cover. As the broods get older, they switch to riparian areas and shrubby
vegetation (Mussehl 1962).
LIMITING FACTORS
Reforestation practices that include high density replanting, herbicide application, and
fertilization result in rapid tree canopy closure which reduces blue grouse use (Bendell and Elliott
1967, Zwickel and Bendell 1985). In drier areas, intense grazing of open lowland forests reduces
the quality and availability of breeding habitat (Mussehl 1962, Seaburg 1966, Zwickel 1972).
MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Streams, springs, and wet meadows should be safeguarded from potential damage due to livestock grazing and logging operations. Lush vegetation, shrubs, and deciduous trees associated with such areas should be retained for blue grouse brooding and feeding habitat. Grazing should be managed for maximum forb production. The grazing intensity should be light enough to allow grass/forb vegetation to reach a standing height of 20 cm (8 in) (Mussehl 1962, Seaburg 1966). Preferred brooding areas for blue grouse include grass and forb communities that are up to 30 cm (12 in) high. Moderate grazing from May through August or grazing deferred until after 1 August, preserves nesting, brooding, and feeding cover (Soil Conservation Service 1969). Heavy grazing on lower slopes can be deleterious to blue grouse habitat (Johnsgard 1973).
Reforestation activities should address the needs of blue grouse. Succession is naturally rapid, but it is accelerated by dense plantings of Douglas fir. Allowing the tops of hills and low-productivity sites to remain unplanted would be beneficial to blue grouse as breeding areas (Johnsgard 1973, Zwickel and Bendell). Forbs should always be included in seed mixes when reseeding forest land and range where blue grouse occur (Seaburg 1966). Mussehl (1962) showed that blue grouse preferred sites composed of at least 11% forbs. Openings in densely forested areas such as Vancouver Island, Canada, are important to blue grouse. Logging activity and fire in the low to mid-elevations can open up the forest canopy which may improve breeding habitat.
Cade (1984) recommended using clearcuts smaller than 250 m (820 ft) across and leaving at least
40 trees/ha (16 trees/ac) that have a minimum 24 cm (9 in) diameter on wintering areas.
Selective cuts or long rotations greater than 60 years are also better for wintering blue grouse
than clearcuts (Cade and Hoffman 1990). Winter roost areas should be retained, including
mature, mistletoe-laden Douglas fir thickets near ridges (R. McKeel, personal communication;
M. Quinn, personal communication).
REFERENCES
Aldrich, J. W. 1963. Geographic orientation of American Tetraonidae. Journal of Wildlife Management 27:529-545.
Beer, J. 1943. Food habits of the blue grouse. Journal of Wildlife Management 7:32-44.
Bendell, J. F., and P. W. Elliott. 1967. Behavior and the regulation of numbers in blue grouse. Canadian Wildlife Service. 76pp.
Boag, D. 1963. Significance of location, year, sex, and age to the autumn diet of blue grouse. Journal of Wildlife Management 27:555-562.
Cade, B. S. 1984. Winter habitat preferences and migration patterns of blue grouse in Middle Park Colorado. Colorado Fish and Game (W-37-R) 01-03-045.
Cade, B. S., and R.W. Hoffman. 1990. Winter use of Douglas fir forests by blue grouse in Colorado. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:471-479.
Johnsgard, P. A. 1973. Grouse and quails of North America. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA. 533pp.
Martinka, R. R. 1972. Structural characteristics of blue grouse territories in southwestern Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management 36:428-510.
Mussehl, T. W. 1962. Some physical characteristics of ground vegetation used by blue grouse broods. Unpublished Report. Montana Fish and Game, Helena, Montana, USA. 11pp.
Seaburg, K. 1966. The big blue grouse. Montana Wildlife. July: 23-27.
Smith, R. B. 1990. Forest grouse management plan. Pages 40-46 in Upland Game Management Plan 1991-1995. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, Idaho, USA.
Soil Conservation Service. 1969. Habitat management for blue grouse. U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Spokane, Washington, USA. 2pp.
Washington Department of Game. 1961. Population study of blue grouse, north central Washington. W64-R-3. Washington Department of Game, Olympia, Washington, USA. 11pp.
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 1996. 1995 Game Harvest Report. Wildlife Management Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, USA. 99pp.
Zwickel, F. C. 1972. Some effects of grazing on blue grouse during summer. Journal of Wildlife Management 36:631-634.
Zwickel, F. C., and J. F. Bendell. 1985. Blue grouse-effects on and influences of a changing forest. The Forestry Chronicle 61:185-188.
PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS
| Roger McKeel, Wildlife Program Manager Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Yakima, Washington |
Mark Quinn, Wildlife Program Manager Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Ephrata, Washington |
CONTACTS
| Dave Ware, Upland Game Program Manager Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 N. Capitol Way Olympia, WA 98501 (360) 902-2200 |
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 3704 Griffin Lane SE Suite 102 Olympia, WA 98501-2192 (360)753-9440 |
| Washington State University Cooperative Extension Service 921 Lakeridge Drive SW Room 216 Olympia, WA 98502 (360)786-5445 |
U.S. Natural Resource Conservation Service 316 W. Boone Ave. Suite 450 Spokane, WA 99201-2348 (509) 353-2354 |
KEY POINTS
Habitat Requirements
Management Recommendations