600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1091
Archived documents do not reflect current WDFW regulations or policy and may contain factual inaccuracies.
April 30, 1997
Contact: Tony Meyer, NWIFC (360) 438-1181, ext. 325 Sandi Snell, WDFW (360) 902-2229
Coho Management Agreement reached
A number of treaty Indian tribes and the Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife have agreed on a comprehensive, cooperative framework to implement
hatchery coho mass marking and selective fisheries that will help conserve the
resource while also providing harvest opportunities. The National Marine Fisheries
Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service also have approved the agreement.
The agreement clears the way for the resumption this spring of fin-clipping coho
reared in state hatcheries. About 3.2 million young Puget Sound coho will have their
adipose fin (the fleshy fin near the tail) removed so that they can be distinguished from
wild coho. Fin-clipping or mass marking could provide increased opportunities for
fishermen to harvest hatchery fish while minimizing impacts to wild salmon stocks.
"This agreement reiterates our strong desire to build on our relationship with the
tribes and work together in a cooperative, productive fashion," said Department of Fish
and Wildlife Director Bern Shanks. "I'm extremely pleased this joint agreement has
been worked out and we can jointly move forward with our cooperative coho
"We are pleased that the tribes and state, as co-managers, have been able to
work out our concerns regarding mass marking," said Billy Frank Jr., Northwest Indian
Fisheries Commission chairman. "However, this plan will have little value in the years
to come if we don't address habitat loss and degradation. The tribes are eager to move
forward with the state and others to develop and implement a comprehensive plan to
protect weak wild salmon stocks."
While current fisheries harvest management efforts are conserving wild salmon
stocks, one of the costs often is reduced fishing opportunities for hatchery fish. This is
especially true in mixed stock fishing areas, such as the Strait of Juan de Fuca and
north coast, where hatchery stocks mingle with depressed wild stocks before each
seeks out its stream of origin. In recent years, fishing in these areas has been severely
reduced to protect weak wild stocks.
Mass marking and selective fisheries provides fishing opportunities in mixed
stock areas while maintaining the ability to conserve wild stocks. Anglers are able to
identify and keep the fin-clipped hatchery fish, while releasing the unmarked wild fish.
Under the agreement a process and schedule have been established to reach
agreement or resolve disputes about marking the rest of Puget Sound hatchery fish this
fall. Beginning in 1998, proposed coho selective fisheries will be evaluated individually
and will be implemented only as part of agreed annual fishery management plans that
address a wide range of fisheries issues.
Treaty tribes obtained a court order last fall to stop the mass marking program
mandated by the state Legislature because of its potential harm to the coastwide
coded wire tagging program. The state proposed to use the same fin-clip for mass
marking that is used by tribal, state and federal hatcheries along the West Coast to
mark hatchery and wild fish that have had the coded wire tags inserted in their snouts.
The tribes, federal agencies and Canada were concerned that the mass marking
program would compromise the accuracy of data obtained through the tagging
program. That data forms the foundation of domestic fisheries management in the
region, is critical to implementation of the Pacific Salmon Treaty with Canada, and is
necessary to evaluate the effects of selective fisheries on wild salmon populations.
Under terms of the agreement, tribal, state and federal fisheries managers will
work together, as well as with Canada, to ensure that the coded wire tagging program
continues to be implemented as an integral part of overall coho management. The
framework also calls for the state and tribes to improve scientific procedures, adopt
consistent, coordinated management procedures and resolve any differences that may