WDFW LogoWashington Department of Fish & Wildlife
  HELP | EMPLOYMENT | NEWS | CONTACT  
WDFW LogoPublications

You will need Adobe Reader to view and print publications.

Get Adobe Reader
Get Adobe® Reader

Archived Publications
contain dated information
that do not reflect current
WDFW regulations or policy.
These documents are provided
for archival purposes only.


 

    Advanced Search
  Search Tips

 
Download PDF Download Document

Get Adobe® Reader

Re-establishment of Viable Populations of Sharp-tailed Grouse in Washington: 2009 Progress Report

Category: Wildlife Research and Management - Non-Game Management and Conservation

Date Published: December 2009

Number of Pages: 20

Author(s): Mike Schroeder, Mike Atamian, Howard Ferguson, Mike Finch, Derek Stinson and Richard Whitney

ABSTRACT:

Declining populations and distribution of Columbian sharp-tailed grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus columbianus) in Washington have resulted in serious concerns for their long-term conservation status. Translocations of sharp-tailed grouse from ‘healthy’ populations outside the state are being conducted to improve the vigor of populations within Washington. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, in cooperation with the Colville Confederated Tribes, translocated 213 Columbian sharp-tailed grouse from central British Columbia, southeastern Idaho, and north-central Utah to Washington State in spring 2005-2009. The release sites in Washington included Dyer Hill (south of Brewster in Douglas County), Swanson Lakes (south of Creston in Lincoln County), and Nespelem (east of Nespelem in Okanogan County). Two of the release sites include state-owned public land and the third site is Colville Tribal land; all three are being managed for the benefit of wildlife, and in particular sharp-tailed grouse. In all three release sites, sharp-tailed grouse declined through the year 2005, despite the acquisition and protection of habitat and ongoing habitat restoration efforts. Efforts to monitor movement, survival, and productivity of the translocated birds are ongoing. It is too early in the process to determine whether the augmentations should be considered a success.