WDFW Home PageFish & Wildlife Science
Home
Research Briefs
Science Papers
Hatchery Reform
Links
Article Archives
 
Fish & Wildlife Science
is published by the
Washington Department
of Fish & Wildlife
http://wdfw.wa.gov

Jeff Koenings, Ph.D.
Director

Jerry Gutzwiler
Chairman
Washington Fish &
Wildlife Commission
 

Article Archives

WDFW studies causes of Cherry Point herring decline
Posted July 2001

Summary
The Pacific herring– a small fish that plays a huge role in Washington's marine ecosystem– is in trouble in some areas of Puget Sound.

Herring, historically one of the most abundant fishes in Puget Sound, are a staple in the diets of salmon and many other species of fish, marine mammals and seabirds.

The nearshore and intertidal environment is critical to the continued abundance of herring in Puget Sound. Herring utilize these waters to deposit their eggs at very specific locations– 20 distinct locations in Puget Sound and coastal waters.

Ironically, the spawning ground where herring were once the most prolific– Cherry Point near Bellingham– is now in trouble. Herring spawning rates at Cherry Point have declined 94 percent from historic levels, to the point that scientists now question the ability of the stock to sustain itself.

The reasons for the decline of Cherry Point herring has been the focus of on-going research involving scientists from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and other agencies.


By Greg Bargman, Marine Fish Unit
WDFW Fish Program

The stock of Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi) which spawns in the vicinity of Cherry Point, near Bellingham, was once the largest in Washington. This stock has shown a dramatic decline in abundance in recent years and is now at an unprecedented low level.

The decline causes concerns not only about the continued existence of this stock, but also over the impacts on other species of fish, marine mammals and seabirds which feed on these fish and their spawned eggs. Herring are one of the key links in the Puget Sound food web. Its abundance and high energy content make it an ideal food source for a wide variety of animals (Table 1).

Table 1. Major Predators of Pacific Herring

Species % of Diet Comprised of Herring
Pacific cod
42
Lingcod
71
Halibut
53
Chinook salmon
62
Harbor seal
32
- Data from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada

On-going WDFW research
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) biologists have been studying the stock of herring at Cherry Point since the mid-1970s. Initial efforts consisted of monitoring the run and managing the fishery for spawning herring.

However, since the mid-1980s, the emphasis has changed from fishery management to resource conservation. WDFW has re-focused its efforts to protect the herring resource and provide a basis for stock rebuilding.

Key research efforts now underway involve:

  • Genetic stock identification - The genetics of Pacific herring are poorly understood. A proper understanding of the genetics of herring stocks would be a major benefit in protecting the resource. WDFW conducted two separate studies of Pacific herring in 2000. Both studies compared the genetic composition of Cherry Point herring to that of herring from other locations in Puget Sound and in British Columbia. In addition, WDFW supplied herring samples to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans in British Columbia for a similar study of Canadian herring. All three studies indicated that herring from Cherry Point had genetic differences from herring collected in other locations. However, this difference was much less than the differences noted in salmon collected from different spawning locations.
     
  • Lipid levels - Some research has investigated the lipid (fat) abundance in adult herring. Low lipid levels may adversely affect herring survival and reflect a lack of food. Recent results from British Columbia indicate that spawning herring there have low levels of lipids. Preliminary results indicate that herring spawning at Cherry Point have very low levels of lipids.
     
  • Mortality studies - WDFW is conducting research to determine the cause of increasing adult herring mortality. One area of investigation is chemical contamination of adult herring. WDFW scientists are collecting adult herring from a variety of locations in Puget Sound and analyzing their tissues for the presence of a wide variety of contaminants. These contaminants may be having sub-lethal effects on the adults, or may be adversely affecting their reproductive success.

Life cycle of herring
The Pacific herring is a species of small, schooling fish found throughout Puget Sound and the northeast Pacific Ocean. Herring spawn at 20 well-defined locations in Washington. The spawning grounds are very specific, as is the time of spawning. The peak of spawning rarely varies more than seven days from one year to the next.

Herring spawn by depositing eggs on vegetation or other shallow water substrate in subtidal or intertidal habitat. The eggs are adhesive and stick to the substrate until they hatch 10 to 12 days later (the hatching time depends on water temperature). Following hatching, the herring larvae drift in water currents as they feed on plankton.

Following larval metamorphosis, the young herring spend their first year of life in Puget Sound, although some portion of the fish may spend their summers in the ocean, on the west side of Vancouver Island.

When they reach sexual maturity at two to four years of age, the herring migrate back to their spawning ground. Unlike salmon, herring do not all die following spawning. Individual fish can spawn annually for several years.

Cherry Point stock
The Cherry Point spawning stock is one of the most important herring stocks in Washington for two reasons. First, the stock is historically the largest in Washington waters. Herring spawning at Cherry Point comprised about 32 percent of the state's known total abundance. Secondly, Cherry Point herring are spring spawning fish, in contrast to other Washington herring stocks, which are winter spawning stocks (Table 2).

Table 2. Major herring spawning grounds in Puget Sound
WINTER SPAWNING STOCKS
(JANUARY TO MARCH
)
SPRING SPAWNING STOCKS
(APRIL TO JUNE
)
Squaxin Pass Cherry Point
Quartermaster Harbor  
Port Orchard/Port Madison  
South Hood Canal  
Quilcene Bay  
Port Gamble  
Kilisut Harbor  
Skagit Bay  
Fidalgo Bay  
Samish-Portage Bay  
NW San Juan Islands  
Interior San Juan Island  
Semiahmoo Bay  
Discovery Bay  
Dungeness Bay  

Cherry Point herring spawning grounds extend from the north end of Bellingham Bay north to the Canadian border and include waters around Point Roberts and much of Lummi Island (Fig. 2). Cherry Point is in the approximate middle of the spawning grounds and hence gives the stock its name. These areas also encompass a large variety of human uses, from largely rural Lummi Island, to residential Birch Bay, to the site of some of the largest industrial plants in Washington at Cherry Point itself.

While fishery scientists have documented reports of herring spawning in the vicinity of Cherry Point since the 1930s, little was known of their abundance until the early 1970s.

At that time, interest in commercial fishing for herring was rapidly increasing and in 1973 the first scientific studies of herring at Cherry Point were initiated. In 1973, the abundance was estimated to be 14,000 tons of spawning herring. Since that time, the population has been in decline, reaching a low point of slightly over 800 tons in 2000 (Fig. 3). This is a 94 percent decline from initial measured abundance levels. Currently, the annual run is well below the minimum escapement goal, which brings into doubt the ability of the stock to sustain itself.

The escapement goal is the minimum amount of spawners needed each year for the stock to sustain itself at a level that can replace the population and provide a harvest component. When the number of spawning herring falls below this level, there is reason to believe that reproductive success will be reduced. For Cherry Point herring, the minimum escapement goal has been calculated to be 3,200 tons. But Cherry Point herring have not reached this level of spawning activity for four consecutive years.

As the stock size has decreased, spawning herring have utilized less of their spawning grounds. The concentration of spawning within a limited portion of the overall habitat when the stock is small has been observed in Atlantic herring as well. In the last few years at Cherry Point, the spawning has been concentrated in a few small areas (See Cherry Point map above). Today, only about five kilometers of the spawning grounds are utilized. This concentration of eggs within a small area increases the vulnerability of the eggs to the impact of an oil spill.

Recruitment is measured as the amount of herring spawning for the first time. Herring have variable recruitment levels. Many factors can affect the amount of recruitment. The number of eggs deposited is, of course, an important determinant in the level of recruitment. However, in many cases, the level of recruitment is not closely related to the number of eggs deposited. Storms, lack of food, disease and predation can strongly influence recruitment. In Cherry Point herring, recruitment has averaged 2,000 tons annually and has varied widely from year to year (Fig. 6). This recruitment pattern is common with Pacific herring in other parts of the world. However, recruitment has been well below average for the last four years.

The survival rate of adult herring from one year to the next has plummeted since the 1970s (Fig. 7). In the mid 1970s, between 70 and 80 percent of adult herring survived a year and returned to spawn the next year. By the late 1990s this survival rate had decreased to 20 to 30 percent annually. This is a huge change in the biology of herring and can explain much of the decline in abundance.

The decreasing survival rate of adult herring has changed the age composition of the overall stock. Herring spawning at Cherry Point are getting younger. In the mid 1970s, for example, spawning fish ranged in age from 2 to 7 years old (Fig. 8). By 1996, fish older than four years had become extremely scarce in the spawning population (Fig. 9). This means that in recent years, most of the spawning fish were comprised of one or two age classes.

Possible causes of decline
In general, other stocks of herring in Puget Sound have not shown a decline in abundance similar to Cherry Point herring (Fig. 10). While stocks show considerable variation in abundance from year to year, there is no trend comparable to that observed for the Cherry Point herring.

Fishing levels have been considered as a contributing factor to the decline in Cherry Point herring. Concurrent with increased interest in commercial fishing for herring, a commercial fishery at Cherry Point was authorized in 1973. During the early years of this fishery, commercial harvest took up to 30 percent of the run annually (Fig. 11). That high level of harvest clearly contributed to the decline in spawning biomass which is to be expected in unexploited populations. However, the commercial fishery was significantly reduced by 1981, and continued at very low levels (<5 percent) until 1996 when it was closed completely. The reduced fishing opportunity was instituted by the Department of Fish and Wildlife and tribal co-managers. Despite the fishing curtailment and closure, the Cherry Point stock has continued to decline. Since there is no known harvest of these fish in areas away from the spawning grounds, we can conclude that while fishing contributed to the initial decline of the stock, it has not been a factor in nearly two decades.

Besides human harvest, there is some thought that predation by other fish and animals may have played a role in the decline. Herring are fed upon by a wide variety of other animals. The populations of at least two of these predators, harbor seals and Pacific hake in the Georgia Basin area, have increased substantially since the mid-1970s and may be contributing to the decline of herring. However, the populations of other predators such as lingcod, Pacific cod and chinook salmon also declined in recent years.

Environmental factors are also believed have a significant effect on Cherry Point herring. Because of the large amount of industrial activity at Cherry Point associated with refineries and other heavy industry, and the large amount of shipping and petroleum movement in or near the spawning grounds, it has been suggested that contamination of the spawning grounds may be causing or contributing to the decline. In response to these concerns, the University of Washington conducted studies (funded by the state Department of Natural Resources) of developing eggs and larvae at Cherry Point. The results of the study indicate that:

  • Newly hatched herring at Cherry Point are smaller than larvae hatched at other locations
  • The rate of abnormal development of larvae is high (Fig. 12)
  • Eggs deposited at Cherry Point have a low hatching rate

Future research
WDFW is expanding its investigation of possible chemical contamination of herring at Cherry Point. We are collecting samples of other fish species and of crab from Cherry Point and other locations in Puget Sound to see if other areas and other species have similar levels of contamination. Results of these studies are anticipated to provide a basis for evaluating the risk to herring from contamination.

There is a need to increase collaboration and the exchange of information with Canadian scientists studying herring in British Columbia. Herring in British Columbia share a similar environment as herring in Puget Sound and active research programs are ongoing in both areas. WDFW is planning to host a workshop this fall to discuss the latest findings in herring biology and research. Scientists from the Pacific coast and Canada will be invited to exchange information.

In addition, there is increasing public interest in research findings involving Cherry Point herring. To help meet this interest, WDFW is planning to host a public forum on herring research this fall.


Related Reading

Alaska Sea Grant 1991. Proceedings of the International Herring Symposium. Alaska Sea Grant Report 91-01

Bargmann, G. 1998. Forage Fish Management Plan. Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife

EVS Environmental Consultants 1999. Cherry Point Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment EVS Project No 2/868-01.0

Lemberg, N., M. O'Toole, D. Penttila and K. Stick 1997 1996 Forage Fish Stock Status Report. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Stock Status Report 98-1

Stout, H.A., R.G. Gustafson, W.H. Lenarz, B. B. McCain, D. M. VanDoormik, T. L. Builder and R. D. Methot 2001. Status Review of Pacific Herring in Puget Sound, Washington. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-45, 175.


Related Website Links:

Washington Forage Fish:
http://wdfw.wa.gov/fish/forage/forage.htm

Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada:
http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/sci/herring/default.htm

StreamNet:
http://www.streamnet.org/ff/Lifehistory/herring_fact.html

University of California Berkeley Digital Library:
http://elib.cs.berkeley.edu/kopec/tr9/html/fam-herrings.html


Author Biography

Greg Bargmann is the manager of marine fish and forage fish for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Fish Program. Greg has worked for WDFW for 27 years. He holds a bachelor of science degree in biology from the University of California, Davis and a master of science degree from the University of Washington.