| |
 |
PDF Format [4.64 MB] |
| |
|
 |
|
The DEIS together with the draft planis now available for a 95-day public review. Comments must be received no later than 5pm on January 8, 2010.
Written comments may be
submitted online or mailed to:
WDFW SEPA Desk,
600 Capitol Way N. Olympia, WA
98501-1091
If you require this information in an alternative format, please e-mail wildthing@dfw.wa.gov |
October 5, 2009
The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) has published a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) titled: Wolf Conservation and Management
Plan for Washington. This is a non-project review proposal. Non-project review allows
agencies and the public to focus on issues that are ready for decision.
Gray wolves were classified as endangered in Washington at the federal level in 1973
and at the state level in 1980. They were delisted under federal law in 2009 in the
eastern third of Washington, and remain federally listed in the western two-thirds of the
state; they continue to be state listed throughout Washington. Expansion of a currently
small breeding population of wolves in Washington is expected as a result of increased
dispersal of wolves from recovering populations in Idaho and Montana, and dispersers
from British Columbia.
In response to this, and in anticipation of the eventual return of all wolf management to
the state, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife initiated development of a
state wolf conservation and management plan. A determination of significance and
request for comments on scope of an environmental impact statement (EIS) was issued
August 1, 2007. WDFW appointed an advisory Wolf Working Group comprised of 17
citizens to provide recommendations on the plan to WDFW. The draft plan establishes
conservation/recovery objectives for downlisting and delisting the species, and
identifies strategies to address conflicts and achieve recovery. This draft plan and DEIS
incorporate recommendations and suggestions from public scoping comments, peer
review comments, WDFW reviews and the Wolf Working Group recommendations.
For more information, see: Wolf Plan Development Process and Archive
|
| |