![]() | ![]() |
Final
Washington State Recovery Plan For the Fisher Draft
Fisher Recovery Plan See also:
In 1990, the Washington Wildlife Commission adopted procedures for listing and de-listing species as endangered, threatened, or sensitive and for writing recovery and management plans for listed species (WAC 232-12-297, Appendix C). The procedures, developed by a group of citizens, interest groups, and state and federal agencies, require preparation of recovery plans for species listed as threatened or endangered. Recovery, as defined by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is the process by which the decline of an endangered or threatened species is arrested or reversed, and threats to its survival are neutralized, so that its long-term survival in nature can be ensured. This is the final Washington State Recovery Plan for the Fisher. It summarizes the historic and current distribution and abundance of fishers in Washington and describes factors affecting the population and its habitat. It prescribes strategies to recover the species, such as protecting the population and existing habitat, evaluating and restoring habitat, potential reintroduction of fishers into vacant habitat, and initiating research and cooperative programs. Interim recovery objectives and other criteria for reclassification are identified. The draft state recovery plan for the fisher was reviewed by researchers and representatives from state, tribal, and federal agencies, regional experts, and non-governmental organizations. This review was followed by a 90-day public comment period. Responses to the public comments are included in Appendix B. All comments received were considered in preparation of the final recovery plan. For additional information about fishers or other state listed species, see the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife web site (http://wdfw.wa.gov/wildlife.htm), or contact: Endangered Species
Section Manager |
Final Washington
State Recovery Plan for the Fisher
The fisher is a large, stocky dark brown member of the weasel family. It has a long bushy tail, short, rounded ears, short legs, and a low-to-the-ground appearance. Historically, fishers were widely distributed in Washington in dense, mesic forests at low to mid-elevations. The geographic distribution of trapping reports and collected specimens confirms that fishers occurred throughout the Cascades, Olympic Peninsula, and parts of southwestern and northeastern Washington, although it does not appear that they were as abundant in Washington as in other parts of their range. Fishers occur only in North America, and between the late 1800s and early 1900s populations were nearly extirpated over much of their former range in the United States and eastern Canada. The two most significant causes of the fisher’s decline were over-trapping and loss and fragmentation of low- and midelevation late-successional forests. Trapping reduced populations quickly. Despite decades of protection from harvest, fisher populations never recovered in Washington. Fishers use forest structures associated with late-successional forests, such as large live trees, snags and logs, for giving birth and raising their young, as well as for rest sites. Travel among den sites, rest sites, and foraging areas occurs under a dense forest canopy; large openings in the forest are avoided. Commercial forestry removed the large trees, snags and logs that were important habitat features for fishers, and short harvest rotations (40-60 years) didn’t allow for the replacement of these large tree structures. Clearcuts fragmented remaining fisher habitat and created impediments to dispersal, thus isolating fishers into smaller populations that increased their risk of extinction. The fisher was listed as endangered in Washington in 1998 by the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission and is now considered likely extirpated from the state. In 2004, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concluded that the West Coast fisher population constitutes a distinct population segment and that a federal listing of endangered is warranted. However, the Service precluded listing the species because of pending proposals for other species of higher priority. The West Coast distinct population segment of the fisher population is now on the federal list of candidate species and was given a listing priority number of 6 (1-12 scale). A self-sustaining fisher population is not likely to become re-established in the state without human intervention. Reintroductions are the only means of recovery in western Washington and have been successful in the recovery of fisher populations in other parts of the fisher’s range. Federal lands (national parks and national forests) are important for fisher recovery in Washington. Federal lands have substantial areas of late-successional forest and additional fisher habitat is likely to become available in the future on the national forest land base as forests mature under guidelines established in the 1994 Northwest Forest Plan. A reintroduction feasibility study was conducted for western Washington that identified three large areas of suitable habitat that may support fisher populations. These included the Olympic Peninsula, the southwestern Cascades, and the northwestern Cascades. Olympic National Park was identified as the most suitable for the first reintroduction, followed by the southwestern and northwestern Cascades. Results from research and monitoring of the Olympic Peninsula population will guide future translocations in the Cascade Mountains and, possibly, the Selkirk Mountains. The recovery plan outlines strategies that, when implemented, will likely restore self-sustaining fisher populations to Washington. The recovery plan identifies three recovery areas in Washington: the Olympic, Cascade, and Selkirk. The current state of knowledge of fisher ecology in Washington does not allow for the development of population numbers or specific geographic distribution goals as recovery criteria. The recovery strategies focus on re-establishing fishers at multiple locations in the state. Interim objectives will likely be modified as more is learned about the habitat needs and population dynamics of fishers in Washington. The interim recovery objectives of the fisher recovery plan are: Fishers will be considered for downlisting from State Endangered to State Threatened status when:
Fishers will be considered for downlisting from State Threatened to State Sensitive status when:
Fisher recovery strategies
include assessing the feasibility of reintroductions in these three
recovery areas (Olympic, Cascade,
Selkirk), conducting reintroductions, monitoring populations, protecting
established fisher populations, conducting research on the needs and limiting
factors of fisher populations
in Washington, and developing a conservation strategy for fisher habitat at
multiple spatial scales. Longterm persistence of fishers in Washington
will depend on federal land managers providing suitable habitat
and habitat connectivity. Federal land managers are currently collaborating
with scientists to develop a “Fisher Conservation Assessment and Conservation Strategy” for
Washington, Oregon, and California. The assessment and strategy should
provide guidance for management of forests on federal lands throughout
the region to provide fisher habitat and maintain connectivity. Achieving recovery
will require cooperation
and partnerships among, state, federal, and local agencies, tribes, timber
industry, non-governmental organizations, and private citizens.
For more information on wildlife management issues, please contact WDFW Wildlife Management Program. Phone: 360-902-2515
|
Back to Species of Concern Homepage
Find a bug or error in the system? Let us know about it!
©
2008
Washington Department of
Fish and Wildlife
E-mail <webmaster@dfw.wa.gov>