| Accomplishments
for Game Management
Game
Management Plan: The greatest overall accomplishment in
the past year was the completion of the first Game Management
Plan. This Plan, adopted by the Fish and Wildlife Commission
in December 2002, lays out the priorities for the next six
years for hunted species. The Plan is fairly aggressive
in the number and breadth of strategies to be implemented.
The
Department is committed to changing the way we work with
the public to ensure a better partnership as we begin implementing
the Plan. The first step in this new partnership is a public
meeting set for August 23rd at Central Washington University
in Ellensburg. The main purpose for the meeting is to cooperatively
design a process that provides better, more continuous exchange
of information and ideas that leads to hunting season changes
and implementation of strategies in the Plan. Watch for
news releases or additional information on the Departments
Web page at www.wa.gov/wdfw.
2003-05
Hunting Season Package: The new Game Management Plan drove
the most significant changes to the hunting seasons. The
changes resulted in expanded opportunities for senior, youth,
and hunters with disabilities along with greater attention
to providing balanced deer and elk hunting opportunities
across the state for archers, muzzleloaders, and modern
firearm hunters.
The
modern firearm mule deer season in north-central Washington
was extended by five days; the early archery elk season
was shifted to mid-September; and several additional areas
will be available for the early muzzleloader deer and elk
season. In addition, the number of fall turkey permits were
significantly increased, the pheasant season was shifted
to a later start date, and permits are available that allow
hunters to harvest two white-tailed deer, one buck and one
antlerless. For more information, hunters should review
the 2003 Big Game pamphlet. The 2003 Waterfowl and Upland
Bird pamphlet will be available in September.
Elk
Management: New studies were initiated to gather better
information about the Colockum, Yakima and Blue Mountains
elk herds. The Colockum study is looking at body condition
of elk that is similar to past studies in western Washington
and the Yakima herd. The idea is to find out why productivity
is relatively poor in this herd.
With
the recent completion of the Yakima elk herd plan, a major
study has been initiated between the U.S. Forest Service,
the Yakama tribe, and WDFW to ultimately determine whether
there is enough habitat to support the number of elk in
that herd. The study in the Blue Mountains is in cooperation
with the Nez Perce and Umatilla tribes to look at mortality
factors. This herd has been significantly below population
objective for many years and this mortality study is designed
to help determine ways to increase the herd. The Rocky Mountain
Elk Foundation, Eyes in the Woods, Inland Northwest Wildlife
Council, and other organizations provided funding and volunteer
support for these projects.
Cougar
& Black Bear Management: Two biologists were hired to
address human/dangerous wildlife interactions and cougar
and black bear population management. They are developing
long term strategies and responding to incidents in chronic
problem areas, developing educational programs, and monitoring
the impacts of hunting and removal strategies. Aggressive
tactics to address increasing cougar populations appear
to be working with recent evidence of population declines
and reduced complaint levels. See the cougar article in
this publication for more information.
Pheasant
Workshop: A group of mid-west pheasant experts were asked
to share ideas with Washington regarding how to address
our problems. The Department organized a public forum where
hunters, the organization Pheasants Forever, landowners,
biologists, and participants ultimately developed a set
of recommendations for what can be done in the future.
The
main points of the recommendations are: to work very closely
with Federal farm programs to fund activities that are beneficial
to pheasants; to focus attention and funding in key geographic
areas where success can be realized; to identify the limiting
factors or bottlenecks in these areas that are keeping the
pheasant population from growing; to develop partnerships
with farmers and other conservation groups to find mutually
beneficial techniques of providing pheasant habitat; and
that production habitat (nesting and brood rearing) has
been identified as most limiting through pheasant range.
Private
Lands Review: Hunters have identified access and wildlife
habitat enhancement on private lands as a significant issue.
A stakeholders group has been formed to provide recommendations
to the Department on improving existing programs and/or
developing new ones. Members include farmers, farming organizations,
timberland owners, hunting and conservation organizations,
current participants in Department programs, and the Northwest
Indian Fish Commission. The group has been focusing on review
of the state’s Private Lands Wildlife Management Areas
as a first step. They are scheduled to provide recommendations
on this part of the Department’s private lands program
later this summer. Watch for additional information from
the Department in September.
Bighorn
Sheep Augmentation: Forty bighorn sheep captured in Oregon
and Nevada were relocated to central and eastern Washington
to boost low-population herds. This is an effort to bolster
population growth and enhance genetic variability in some
of our herds that are below management objectives. Funding
was provided by the Foundation for North American Wild Sheep
and through Washington’s auction and raffle of sheep
tags.
Ten bighorns were released in the Sinlahekin area of Okanogan
County, five were released in the Mount Hull area of Okanogan
County, five were released in the Tieton River area of Yakima
County, eight bighorns were released in the Whitestone area,
seven in the Lincoln Cliffs area along Lake Roosevelt in
northern Lincoln County, and five were released in the Vulcan
Mountain area of Ferry County.
|