For more information on the Living With Wildlife series, contact the WDFW Wildlife Program


Pronghorn Antelope
Download PDF
Print Version
Photo of a herd of pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra americana)
Figure 1.The pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra americana) is the rarest and least-known hoofed-mammal classified as a game species in the state of Washington.
Pronghorns in Washington
Living with Pronghorns
Food habits
Avoiding or minimizing conflicts

The pronghorn antelope (antilocapra americana) is the rarest and least known hoofed mammal classified as a game species in the state of Washington. Although often simply called antelope, pronghorns are not true antelope at all. Most authorities consider them the sole modern member of the Antilocapridae family, while all other horned ungulates (mammals with hooves) in North America belong to the Bovidae family.

Pronghorns are rather small ungulates, measuring from 1 to 1.5 meters (3 to 5 feet) from head to tail, and from 0.8 to 1.0 meters (2.5 to 3 feet) at shoulder height. Adults weigh from 35 to 70 kilograms (77 to 154 pounds). As their name implies, males (and occasionally females) carry black horns that consist of a sheath made of keratin overlaid atop a permanent, boney core. Female horns, if present, are little more than bumps, but those of males have a distinctive shape, with a sharp tip and a forward prong. The horn sheaths of males are shed after the rut and regrown each year. Both males and females feature a cinnamon-brown coat on their backs, with white underside fur and three or four white bands under the neck.

Supremely adopted to open, relatively flat grasslands and shrub lands, pronghorns are great travelers, and some populations migrate large distances annually. They are generally considered the fastest land mammals in North America, sometimes referred to as speed-goats. Pronghorns typically live in groups (larger in winter than summer), although breeding males will separate themselves into small territories in autumn and attempt to entice adult females.

Pronghorn females typically give birth – often to twins – around their second birthday. When on a high nutritional level, pronghorn populations can increase rapidly. Pronghorn fawns, however, are susceptible to coyote predation, starvation, and other sources of mortality.

Pronghorns do not do well in deep snows, and populations can decline severely during harsh winters, particularly if herds are unable to migrate to areas with less snow. Although their anatomy enables them to sprint with ease, they are poor jumpers and do not easily jump over fences in the same way as deer and elk. Instead, pronghorns typically crawl under fences when wishing to cross, but poorly constructed fences can block normal migratory movement and cause mortality.

Pronghorns in Washington

Washington represents the northwestern extent of historical pronghorn range. Pronghorns declined significantly throughout their range in the 19th century, at which time they were extirpated from Washington. This may be the reason some books and reference materials continue to show their native range as excluding Washington. While pronghorns were probably never numerous in the state, their populations ebbed and flowed with large scale climate changes and migrations. Historical records are clear that pronghorns did at least occasionally occupy much of the central portion of the state between the Cascades and the forested northeast and Blue Mountains.

The Washington State Game Department (the predecessor agency to the current WDFW) attempted to establish pronghorn populations by reintroduction on three separate occasions, none of which could be termed successful. In the late 1930s, pronghorns from Nevada were introduced to what is now the Yakima Training Center after first being kept in captivity. In 1950, a separate attempt was made to introduce pronghorns in Adams County, near Ritzville. In 1968, a small number of pronghorns were released in Kittitas and Grant counties. Although many animals survived, reproduced, and moved widely, no animals were known to have survived past the mid-1980s.

Yakama Nation reintroductions
In January 2011, the Yakama Nation reintroduced 99 pronghorns from Nevada onto the Yakama Reservation, with financial and technical assistance provided by Shikar SCI, Safari Club International chapters in Washington state, and the Nevada Department of Wildlife. Nineteen of these wore VHF radio-collars (all of which had ceased operating by autumn 2014). Reproduction was documented, and the herd increased to at least 121 animals as of March 2017. Approximately half of these animals evidently made their homes off the reservation, particularly to the south and east as far as Pasco and south as far as the Columbia River.

In October 2017, the Yakama Nation released an additional 52 pronghorns (30 adult females, 16 juvenile females, and six juvenile males) captured in central Nevada on October 26, 2017. Vectronic GPS collars were fitted on all except one adult pronghorn for monitoring. The final female was radio-marked with a VHF collar. Of the 52 originally captured, 50 survived the trip to the Yakama Reservation and departed from the trailers. One adult female showed signs of stress and needed to be manually removed from the trailer before she walked away on her own, and one juvenile did not survive the journey. Since the release, two mortalities have been recorded. The tribe is monitoring these newly released animals as of 2018, and indications are that these animals will continue to increase in number and range used.

Colville Tribe reintroductions
In January 2016, the Confederated Colville Tribes released 52 pronghorns from Nevada. About 14 of these animals succumbed not long after release. A number of animals crossed south across the Columbia River, in Douglas County. The cold and snowy winter of 2016-17 was rough on these animals, and it is unclear how many ultimately survived. However, as of early January 2018, at least 13 were still alive (10 on the reservation, three in Douglas County). In October 2018, the Colville Tribes released an additional 99 animals at three locations in the southwestern portion of the reservation. At least 29 of the 49 GPS-collared individuals were documented as living relatively near their release sites on the reservations, and an additional 21 animals had moved south across the Columbia River into Douglas County.

Future needs
Future needs include the continued cooperation of private and state officials to coordinate the monitoring and success of pronghorn both on and off the Yakama and Colville reservations. In particular, pronghorn that move away from these reservations will have to be monitored as they disperse from winter groups and seek out fawning grounds.

Living with Pronghorns

Pronghorns are occasionally observed on private lands within Washington. It is useful, therefore, to understand some of the important aspects of their biology that are relevant to coexistence.

Food habits. With their small mouth and specialist teeth, pronghorns are selective feeders. Diets vary depending on geography and availability, so it is difficult to characterize a universally preferred forage. In general, however, pronghorns have been found to prefer forbs over grasses and shrubs over herbaceous material. Pronghorns are known to eat cactus, and many populations subsist largely on sagebrush. However, when available, pronghorns will enter fields of alfalfa, winter wheat, and other cereal crops, causing local damage. At least one study in Kansas, however, suggested that even when present in fields, pronghorns may not forage on winter wheat. Damage is more likely to alfalfa and hayfields. Because of their preference for open spaces where they can detect and escape from predators, they are unlikely to enter orchards, vineyards, or areas with tall crops (e.g., corn, sunflowers). Similarly, they generally avoid both riparian zones and forested areas.

Diseases. All wild animals must cope with naturally occurring pathogens and parasites. Die-offs of pronghorn attributed to the blue-tongue virus have occurred. They are also susceptible to the closely-related epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus. Such disease outbreaks were likely related to exposure of pronghorns to livestock (transmission has apparently not occurred from wild pronghorns to livestock). Individual pronghorns have been documented as succumbing to pneumonia, rabies, and caseous lymphadenitis. Importantly, because pronghorns often live near domestic livestock, they have not been documented as susceptible to (or carriers of) brucellosis, bovine tuberculosis, bovine anaplasmosis, or leptospirosis.

Avoiding or minimizing conflicts: Because of their small size, their ‘dainty’ dietary habitats, and their frequent movements, pronghorns are rarely considered a major agricultural pest. However, in specific circumstances and in local areas, pronghorns can cause damage, particularly to alfalfa fields and stockpiled hay. According to Schemnitz (1994), a number of preventative measures can be taken to reduce pronghorn damage to agricultural crops. These include:

  • Installing woven wire fences of 8-inch mesh, 48 inches high near agricultural fields;
  • Installing electric fences with two wires spaced at 8 to 10 inches and 3 feet above the ground;
  • Installing a single strand of electric wire painted with molasses as an attractant and 30 to 36 inches above the ground;
  • Planting tall crops, such as corn, as a barrier between rangelands and small grain fields;
  • In cases of temporary damage, using propane or acetylene exploders to repel or deter pronghorns.

Suggested reference: Schemnitz, S. 1994. Pronghorn antelope. In Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage — 1994. Cooperative Extension Division, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska – Lincoln.