Olympic marmot (Marmota olympus)

Category: Mammals
State status: Candidate
Vulnerability to climate change (More details)

Moderate-
High

If you see this species, please share your observation using the WDFW wildlife reporting form. Providing detailed information such as a photo and exact coordinates will improve the confidence and value of this observation to WDFW species conservation and management.

The Olympic marmot is endemic to mountainous meadows of the Olympic Peninsula, Olympic marmot populations have possibly stabilized since 2007 after declining from 2002 to 2006. Threats potentially include increased coyote predation, and habitat fragmentation due to rising tree line (caused by declining snow pack and climate change), resulting in greater population isolation and increasing the risk of inbreeding and extinction.

The Olympic marmot was designated the State Endemic Mammal by the Washington State Legislature in 2009.

Description and Range

Physical description

The Olympic marmot has brownish fur interspersed with white. Their total length is about 18 to 32 inches with a tail that is about 6 to 10 inches long. They  weigh between 9 to 20 pounds. 

Ecology and life history

The Olympic Marmot inhabits subalpine and alpine meadows and talus slopes at elevations from 920 to 1,990 meters. Its range is largely contained within Olympic National Park.

Typical habitat for Olympic Marmots encompasses subalpine and alpine meadows and talus slopes near timberline at elevations from 300 to 6500 feet. Many colonies are located on south-facing slopes, where food availability is probably greater because of earlier snowmelt. The proximity of nearby suitable meadow habitat may be a limiting factor for colonization or recolonization of vacant habitats. Suitable meadow habitat is naturally fragmented, being distributed in discontinuous patches of varying quality and size (from 12 to more than 250 acres) across exposed mountain slopes.

Olympic Marmots are gregarious and form colonies ranging in size from a few to more than 40 animals. Marmots dig burrows that are used for shelter throughout the year. 

Diet is comprised of herbaceous plants, roots, and woody vegetation. The species hibernates without eating or drinking for seven to eight consecutive months from fall to late spring, relying on accumulated body fat and a much reduced metabolism.

Olympic marmots have a long maturation period, low rate of reproduction, and high juvenile mortality. They are not reproductively mature until 3 years of age, and the average age of females at first reproduction is four and one half years. Only about 30 percent of adult females produce litters in any given year. Litters range in size from one to six pups and are born in underground burrows. Juvenile mortality during the first year is about 50 percent. Marmots can live into their teens.

Young females are fairly sedentary and rarely disperse within about a 1000 feet to establish new home ranges.

Predation by coyotes, not present prior to the 20th century, was the most common cause of mortality for adult females from 2002 to 2006. Coyotes have reportedly inhabited high elevation areas of the Olympic Peninsula for around 60 years, but were rare or absent from the Olympics historically when wolves were widespread in western Washington.

Geographic range

Olympic marmots are endemic to the Olympic Mountains. Localized declines and extirpations have occurred since the late 1980s, while numbers at some sites have remained stable.

Olympic marmots were numerous during a three-year study in the 1960s, but in the late 1990s rangers began noticing many long-occupied meadows no longer hosted marmots.

Predation by coyotes was the most common cause of mortality. The decline in the marmot population during the 1990s and early 2000s, followed by an increase in marmot survival in years with higher snowpack, suggests that coyote predation is affected by snowpack. If this relationship is confirmed, it indicates Olympic marmots will be affected by any decline in average snowpack resulting from climate change.

Climate vulnerability

Sensitivity to climate change

Moderate-
High

Olympic marmots' sensitivity to climate change is driven by several factors. This species is closely associated with subalpine meadows, which are vulnerable to forest encroachment due to increasing temperatures and reduced snowpack. However, increased fire risk resulting from projected increased summer drying may benefit subalpine meadows by preventing conifer encroachment. Olympic marmots are also sensitive to climate change through effects on their primary predator, coyotes. Warmer winters and lower snowpack are thought to allow coyotes to persist at higher elevations than they otherwise could, increasing their predation on Olympic marmots. Evidence suggests that Olympic marmots may also be sensitive to changes in snowpack; prolonged spring snow cover is detrimental to survival and reproduction, whereas sparse winter snow cover increases winter mortality.

Confidence: High

Exposure to climate change

Moderate-
High

  • Increased temperatures
  • Reduced snowpack
  • Changes in precipitation
  • Altered fire regimes
Confidence: High

Conservation

This species is identified as a Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) under the State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP). SGCN-classified species include both those with and without legal protection status under the Federal or State Endangered Species programs, as well as game species with low populations. The WDFW SWAP is part of a nationwide effort by all 50 states and five U.S. territories to develop conservation action plans for fish, wildlife and their natural habitats—identifying opportunities for species' recovery before they are imperiled and more limited.
This species is identified as a Priority Species under WDFW's Priority Habitat and Species Program. Priority species require protective measures for their survival due to their population status, sensitivity to habitat alteration, and/or recreational, commercial, or tribal importance. The PHS program is the agency's main means of sharing fish and wildlife information with local governments, landowners, and others who use it to protect priority habitats for land use planning.

Conservation Threats and Actions Needed

  • Invasive and other problematic species
    • Threat: Predation by an expanding coyote population has caused a decline in Olympic marmot populations.
    • Action Needed: Control coyotes to reduce predation on Olympic marmots.
    • Threat: Controlling fires has favored tree survival, resulting in a gradual decline in suitable open meadow habitat for Olympic marmots.
    • Action needed: Continue monitoring suitable and historical Olympic marmot habitat throughout the range and determine habitat availability over time. Assess habitat use by marmots. Model data to determine management actions.
  • Management decision needs
    • Threat: Controlling fires has favored tree survival, resulting in a gradual decline in suitable open meadow habitat for Olympic marmots.
    • Action Needed: Manage fires to retain contiguous natural alpine meadow openings that benefit Olympic marmots.
  • Education needs
    • Threat: Visitors that feed coyotes may increase the likelihood of Olympic marmot predation by coyotes.
    • Action Needed: Work with wildlife rehabilitators to stop the release of coyotes on the Olympic Peninsula.
  • Climate change and severe weather
    • Threat: Reduced snowpack for multiple decades has resulted in loss of habitat and a shift of coyote occurrence to higher elevations, making Olympic marmots more vulnerable to predation than before.
    • Action Needed: Continue monitoring marmot occupancy in suitable habitat throughout the range and determine habitat availability over time. Model data to determine needed management actions.

See the Climate vulnerability section for more information about the threats of climate change to the Olympic marmot. 

Resources

References

Edelman, A. J. 2003. Marmota olympus. Mammalian Species 736:1-5.

Griffin, S. C. 2007. Demography and ecology of a declining endemic: the Olympic Marmot. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Montana, Missoula.

Griffin, S. C., M. L. Taper, R. Hoffman, and L. S. Mills. 2008. The case of the missing marmots: are metapopulation dynamics or range-wide declines responsible? Biological Conservation 141:1293-1309.

Witczuk, J., S. Pagacz, and L. S. Mills. 2013. Disproportionate predation on endemic marmots by invasive Coyotes. Journal of Mammalogy 94:702-713.

WDFW Publications